Passion: The Enduring Debate

via Lynne Hand on Flickr
via Lynne Hand on Flickr

I like to learn about the origins of words. Not only is such “word etymology” educational, it’s often both fascinating and startling to see how starkly the meanings of words shift over just a few centuries.

Such was the case this morning, when I decided to look up the origins of the word “passion” – maybe I’m in the minority here, but I wasn’t aware how divergent the origins of the word are from what seems to be its common use and meaning today. But I’ll set the stage for this article a bit before going into that.

Of the many debates in the career development world, the one over “passion” might be the most volatile. How much of a role should passion play in career choice? Ask ten career folks and you might get ten different answers, ranging in every position on the continuum from “passion should not play any role” to “passion is the only true factor worth considering.” It’s gotten to the point where passion is one of the most over-used words in the field, and I suspect I’m ultimately one of many who have grown tired of the casual glibness with which the word gets thrown around.

There are a number of values that come into play in the debate on passion and careers. Those who are more inclined to make decisions on the basis of emotions and intuition might be more likely to see passion as a crucial factor in career choice. Conversely, more rational and logical decision makers might fall on the other side of the equation – preferring to base their choices on more quantifiable and/or objective information. There’s also optimism/pessimism, idealism/realism, individualism/collectivism, and any other number of “isms” that might influence one’s position on the passion issue.

To be honest, I’m not sure I have a consistent stance on the issue. I’ve written before about my views on the “dream job” myth and its harmfulness (see post: The Myth of the Dream Job: Defending Rationalism), but I’ve also discussed passion’s relatedness to career and life narratives (see post: Young and Pissed Off). I’d say that if I had to place myself on the aforementioned spectrum, I’d fall somewhere in the middle. Under the right conditions, passion becomes a compass in the search for fulfillment and authenticity in career development. Under the wrong conditions, it represents an ill-defined, elusive, unreachable ideal. The former requires a commitment to self-awareness that few truly ever achieve, while the latter explains why all the “just do what you love” advice rings hollow to so many.

Until this morning, though, I’d never stopped to ask myself, what does passion really mean? So I got to thinking about where the word actually comes from, and its historical origins.

Did you know that the word passion stems from the Latin pati, meaning “to suffer or endure”? That was around the 10th century. It wasn’t until the late 14th century that the generally accepted meaning we ascribe to passion today ( “strong emotion or desire”) emerged (see the whole etymology here).

It’s interesting to think about how that evolved. In another period in history, one’s passion would be the thing that one must endure or suffer for. Today, we think of a passion more as something that we love or aspire to be consumed by.  Am I not the only one to see the similarities between the two?

The thing is, by limiting our definition of passion to “the thing that you love,” we tend to become idealistic, and that doesn’t work for everyone. What if we were to expand our thinking about passion to include its origins? What’s the thing that you must endure? The thing that you are willing to suffer for? These questions have a much more existential flavour. They’re not sweet – they’re very nearly bitter (related: I never, ever put sugar in my coffee). They seem to be asking, “What has meaning for you?” “What is your duty?” “How can you be of service?

If we view passion that way, then I’d venture to say that passion becomes a much more significant factor in career choice. But there’s an important distinction now, thanks to my new-found knowledge of the word:

It’s not about doing what you love all the time. It’s about asking yourself, what’s meaningful enough in life for you to want to endure it?

*Cross-posted in Dave’s Diary at the Career Services Informer.

10 thoughts on “Passion: The Enduring Debate

  1. Great post – I agree that it’s not about doing what you love all of the time; passion should be about finding meaningful work and purpose rather than one perfect job that’s endlessly enjoyable.

    Though I’d say it’s about always working for a cause that you love and believe in, rather than finding something ‘meaningful enough in life that you want to endure it’ – the word ‘endure’ implies hardship, and when you’re working on something that’s meaningful to you I don’t believe it would feel like a hardship.

    1. Appreciate the comment! My thoughts…

      While there’s definitely connotations of suffering in the word “endure,” there are definitions that resonate a bit more with me in this context. “To bear without resistance or with patience” is a good one, and I do believe that would accurately describe a lot of people’s ideal work.

      I’m not sure if doing something meaningful necessarily prevents hardship. In fact, some of the most meaningful pursuits are probably the most difficult!

      For me, and I suspect for many others, there is meaning in endurance – and in suffering. I would hate to separate the two (as would any number of existentialists, I suspect).

      1. I wouldn’t say that doing something meaningful prevents hardship, but I do think it means that you see past the negatives and focus on the good you’re doing – I don’t think it would feel like suffering for a cause.

        Admittedly I’m a bit of an idealist, but I just feel that it’s more than merely enduring or tolerating, it’s about actively embracing any difficulties because you truly believe you’re making a difference.

      2. Sounds like we’re in agreement after all then!

        Making a difference – that would imply doing something meaningful. So, meaning allows you to embrace the difficulty of the task, as opposed to suffering through it.

        How does the Victor Frankl quotation go? “Despair is suffering without meaning.”

        So, suffering with meaning is something different. Might we call it passion?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s